There has been alot of discussion as reports suggests that former WWE
champion, CM Punk quit the company prior to Raw and he told Vince
McMahon he was going home. Punk didn't appear on Raw and was
subsequently removed from live events that he was previously advertised.
As with almost anything in pro wrestling, you have to consider, is it a
work? It's possible that the "walk out" could be an angle to set up the
rumored CM Punk vs. Triple H match at Wrestlemania, but considering
that Punk almost left the promotion three years ago, I doubt they would
try to use the same situation again for a storyline because it wouldn't
generate the same type of buzz after he returned. So, if it's not a
storyline, why would Punk quit just six months before his contract is
set to expire?
Last week, there was an MMA Fighting
interview where Punk mentioned that he didn't know if he would resign
when his current deal expires and he also said that one of his remaining
goals is to main event Wrestlemania. One of the possible scenarios is
that Punk decided to quit after the Royal Rumble because Batista won it
and as a result, Punk wouldn't be in the main event of Wrestlemania. If
Punk wasn't going to resign, Wrestlemania 30 would have been his
opportunity to headline the show before he retired and if he wasn't
booked for his remaining goal then maybe he didn't think another six
months on the road was worth it. Punk might have a reason to quit, as he
has been a work horse during his time in WWE and he has worked injured
in recent months, but a returning former star that will promote a movie
is booked in a title match at the biggest show of the year. This is
really similar situation to when The Rock sporadically returned to the
WWE and it was one of the reasons for the infamous "pipe bomb" promo
from a few years ago. After the promo, Punk said he wanted to change the
WWE and it seems like he tried, but three years later, it's basically
the same situation, as a former star was automatically given a top spot.
Punk's attempt to better the sport is notable, but if recent events
prove anything, it's that the WWE will book their product based on
seemingly trying to tell the fans what they should want to see and
unless there's competition for them or the fans don't watch Raw, the WWE
will probably continue to book similar storylines.
The
other aspect of this situation is if Punk wasn't going to resign later
this year, why would the WWE book him in the top spot of the biggest
show of the year? If Punk wasn't going to resign then from a business
prospective, why would the WWE want to promote him in a top spot when
they could invest the TV time for another star that will still be under
contract after Punk left the company? Also, if Punk wasn't going to
resign, it wouldn't be too surprising if he was booked to job to Triple H
at Wrestlemania, considering that he was jobbing at almost every PPV
prior to him almost leaving the company a few years ago.
If
Punk actually quit, you can't really blame him, as he has been injured
and if a Wrestlemania main event was his only goal before retiring,
there's no reason to risk further injury. At the same time, the WWE has
the right to book their product how they want and if it continues to
draw money, why not? However, it's certainly a statement about the
company when one of the top performers would rather quit and decline a
major pay check for Wrestlemania than work for the company for another
six months. There were some fans on Twitter that mentioned TNA or ROH as
options for Punk after his WWE contract expires, but I think Punk will
retire. Punk made major money in the WWE and there's really no reason
for him to wrestle for a different promotion. TNA is bush league and ROH
probably couldn't afford to sign Punk so it's possible he will retire
after the WWE contract expires. Regardless, Punk had a good run in the
WWE and he provided the audience with some good TV during the past few
years. It should be extremely interesting to see if the WWE acknowledges
Punk's decision on TV and if it will be used for a storyline.
No comments:
Post a Comment