This past week on Raw, Seth Rollins was added to the WWE
World Heavyweight title match that will take place at the Royal Rumble to make
it a triple threat match along with John Cena and the champion, Brock Lesnar.
It certainly makes for an interesting dynamic for the title match up, as Lesnar
has yet to compete against any of the younger stars during his most recent run
with the company. It also sets up a scenario where Lesnar could lose the title
at the Rumble without getting pinned and thus, it keeps him strong for a big
money match at Wrestlemania, but why would the WWE have Lesnar drop the title
prior to the biggest event of the year?
It's fairly well known that Lesnar's current deal is set to
expire after Wrestlemania and considering the millions the WWE invested to sign
him, and the still lackluster network numbers, it seems doubtful that the
company would offer Lesnar another deal similar to the current contract. If
Lesnar exits directly after Wrestlemania, the WWE might not want a performer
that won't be on Raw the next night to main event the biggest show, but they
booked a similar match with The Rock so it's possible. However, Lesnar's
possible exit brings up an interesting question, was Lesnar worth the millions
he was paid for the limited schedule he worked? All things considered, the
answer is probably not because the WWE is using all their resources to push the
WWE network and Lesnar as champion didn't boost the number of subscriptions.
That being said, you can't blame Lesnar for the stagnant numbers, as the WWE
didn't really effectively book him as champion. I mentioned in a previous
column that Lesnar as champion could be used as a "network exclusive"
so to speak and it could help boost the numbers, but the WWE didn't book Lesnar
for any PPV matches for three months in a row so how exactly did Lesnar as
champion help the promotion? He wasn't on TV and he hasn't on PPV so is the pay
off going to be a major surge in subscriptions for his match at the Rumble?
Granted, Lesnar didn't have to be on Raw every week, but he
didn't have to go into the witness protection program either. The argument
could be made that the WWE had to choose his appearances wisely because of his
limited schedule, but if there weren't enough appearance for a logical title
run, why book Lesnar as the champion? Don't get me wrong, this isn't a jab at
Lesnar because you can't blame him for taking the money on the table,
especially for working a lighter schedule. Depending on the perspective, if you
look at Brock's nearly three year run since he returned to the WWE, the buzz
generated around him has somewhat declined, which could be why the PPVs he
wrestled at didn't provide an increase of network subscribers. Despite his
somewhat disapproving demeanor towards pro wrestling, Brock always puts in the
effort to have big time matches so why did the hype around him decline?
If I had to guess, I would say it's the lack of storylines
around most of his PPV matches and the lack of storyline is probably because of
the lack of TV appearances to actually build up the PPV matches. The other
aspect is that Lesnar has only wrestled a few key opponents during his current
run and after a few rematches, it's somewhat stale for some of his appearances. That could be another reason why
Rollins was added to the title match as the Rumble, as it will be the fourth
Cena-Lesnar match on PPV in the past few years.
After the Rumble, if Lesnar is still champion, who
challenges for the title at Wrestlemania? Some fans and seemingly even the WWE
are still banking on Roman Reigns to main event at the top spot, but I don't
think Reigns is ready for it. As I've said previously, it's somewhat
unfair to put the pressure of being the next top guy on Reigns when it's
still fairly early in his career and in some respects, you can't automatically try to make a competitor the next top star, as much of it depends on who the
audience wants to see as the next face of the promotion. John Cena is a rare
breed and he will probably continue to carry the company as the top star until
he retires, which makes sense because even with the great roster at NXT,
there's no guarantee that there's another performer already there that could
step into Cena's role as soon as he retires.
No comments:
Post a Comment