At UFC 200, the biggest event in the history of the promotion, Brock
Lesnar returned to the octagon after a five year absence and defeated
veteran Mark Hunt. The fight itself wasn't exactly spectacular and many
are wondering why Hunt, primarily a kick boxer, didn't throw more
punches, but Lensar used take downs to get the win. Despite the lack of
major action, the victory for the former UFC Heavyweight champion has
already started speculation that Brock could fight again in the future.
When asked about the possibility of an another MMA bout at the
post-fight press conference, he said that Brock Lesnar does what Brock
Lesnar wants to do. However, all that would depend on if the WWE would
be willing to allow Lesnar, who is still until contract, to compete in
the cage again.
As I wrote a few weeks ago, the WWE
took all the risk in this deal, and if Lesnar would've been defeated or
was injured, it could've damaged the selling point of Summer Slam.
Considering the experiment went relatively well, it seems possible that
Vince McMahon would allow Brock to fight again, but the risk/reward
aspect of the deal won't be determined until Summer Slam next month. In
theory, Lesnar winning in the octagon and an ad for WWE airing on the
UFC biggest show will boost viewers for pay-per-view next month, but
will it actually translate to more network subscriptions?
As
a part of the promotional ads for WWE, it was announced that Randy
Orton, who was on the sidelines for several months, will be Lesnar's
opponent at Summer Slam. When you take into account that neither Brock
nor Orton have appeared on WWE TV in several months, you can bet that
management will look to build the feud during the next month and a half,
but logistically, will it translate to a bigger draw?
The
diehard and many causal MMA fans tuned into UFC 200, as well as many
pro wrestling fans that might not usually watch UFC events to see if
Lesnar could win in the octagon again. They saw Brock use ground and
pound punches to cut his opponent. While Mark Hunt wasn't necessarily in
major danger of the fight being stopped because he continued to attempt
to defend the strikes, Lesnar dominated the bout to win via unanimous
decision. After watching Brock punch his opponent in the head for the
majority of the third round, is a match with Randy Orton really going to
be believable? Sure, it's common knowledge that pro wrestling is a
work, but if Brock's MMA win is going to be used to promote Summer Slam,
wouldn't it be somewhat of a letdown if the match with Orton looks
blatantly staged in comparison to UFC 200? From a booking stand point,
the WWE is somewhat in a corner because if Lesnar is pushed as the MMA
fighter, would it be believable if he's selling for Randy Orton? That's
not a jab at Orton either, just an observation that after the UFC bout,
would it be believable if Brock was running the ropes during the match?
Along
with that, Randy Orton might not be the ideal opponent for Brock at
this point because his in ring style might not translate with a
worked-shoot match. Orton has a specific formula and pace to his
matches, and he doesn't usually take major bumps so that isn't exactly
comparable with Lesnar's stiff style. For example, one of the reasons
that the Lesnar/John Cena series worked was because Cena didn't mind
Brock's stiff style, and he was bleeding on more than once occasion
during the Lesnar feud. If you're reading this, you've probably heard
the story about Ken Anderson getting fired when Orton complained after a
suplex on Raw. You can bet that Orton doesn't want to take any stiff
suplex or elbows. Again, that's not a jab at Orton, just an observation
that he might not be the best opponent for Lesnar.
Seth
Rollins made Brock look like a monster, and made himself a star during
their triple threat match with John Cena at the Royal Rumble in 2015 so
he might've been a better selection. Even Nakamura, who actually had a
match with Lesnar in NJPW in 2006, would be a good choice for a match at
Summer Slam. In fact, a Nakamura match could be promoted similar to a
UFC contest with training vignettes aired on WWE TV instead of multiple
in ring appearances. Plus, Paul Heyman has cut the best promos on WWE TV
in the past few years and he could sell the bout on the mic prior to
the PPV. There could be an in ring confrontation between Lesnar and
Nakamura the week of the show and the match is set up. Lesnar's MMA
training and Nakamura using strong style offense could be an intriguing
selling point for the show.
Regardless, Randy Orton is
booked for the spot and if nothing else, it's an indication that Lesnar
will win another match at a major show, but at least the part-timer
isn't defeating the younger stars that aren't fully established this
time. The WWE is paying Brock an amount of money that makes him one of
the highest paid performers on the roster and while he always delivers
quality matches, it seems counter productive to get a return on their
investment if they don't use his appearances to help make new stars. For
example, wouldn't Dean Ambrose have more steam as the WWE champion if
he defeated Brock Lesnar at Wrestlemania? Orton plateaued in terms of
how over he is with the audience and a loss at Summer Slam won't damage
his value to the company. Obviously, Orton has name value, but his run
as a top tier main event star mostly concluded after the lackluster main
event at Wrestlemania 25. This scenario allows Lesnar, the bigger star
in the contest, to get the win and stay strong on WWE programming
without hindering the progress of any of the younger stars on the
roster.
How the match goes and if the presentation is
believable remains to be seen, but more important than that is if more
fans are willing to pay to see Brock Lesnar compete for the sports
entertainment environment. If the WWE/UFC deal translates to more money
for both companies then not only is it a success, but it also proves the
type of commodity that he is for sports. For Lesnar, it's a win-win
situation because he was the highest paid fighter on the UFC card and he
continues to be one of the highest paid performers on the WWE roster.
No comments:
Post a Comment